If those demanding racial justice wish to succeed, they must first renounce the insurrectionists.
by Tim Donner
It has been common to see and hear during this summer of widespread unrest, and in all manner of protests in recent years, the cry of “no justice, no peace.” Simply put, it means the protesters pledge to continue their aggressive dissent until their demands are heard, and action is taken.
But what if the opposite is true, that justice in a free nation cannot be achieved without peace? What if the reality on the ground, as opposed to the imagination of the protesters, is “no peace, no justice?” Should genuine reform be attempted based on the slogans and desires of the rebels, or the truth of immutable human nature?
In this summer of insurrection, the shadow of the late 1960s looms large as we gauge how our fellow citizens are reacting to an ultimately righteous cause hijacked by those willing to break the law with impunity and commit random acts of violence and terror on innocent victims.
President Richard Nixon, hardly a widely admired figure, proved with his victory in 1968 – and more emphatically, a follow-up landslide in 1972 – what is still true today: People want safety above all else and will pull the lever for a candidate who promises to deliver it, no matter how flawed a vessel he might be. Nixon, like Trump today, responded to the growing violence in the anti-Vietnam War movement with a platform of pure law and order, superseding the many other pressing issues of the time.
It takes neither rocket scientist nor brain surgeon to decipher the basic fact that, if people don’t feel safe leaving their homes, little else matters.
Do people fear roving gangs of pro-Trump, white supremacist vigilantes running wild in the streets and punishing anyone who fails to conform to their view of politics and life, as Joe Biden and the left have asserted in recent days? Actually, quite the opposite. They are scared not by those who purport to protect the system, but those on the side of fundamental transformation of America who demand compliance with their own principles – or else.
This is not a subjective opinion, but rather a demonstrable fact based on any fair reading of American history, and that of civilization writ large.
Consider the nations which were overthrown by violent protests and descended into utter chaos and, ultimately, tyranny. Civil wars, begun in just the way we are now witnessing in great cities across the land, were fought in Russia, China, Cuba, and elsewhere, and only the iron hand of totalitarian dictators was able to complete the process of overturning the existing order.
In any democratic form of government, those who proffer radical change must make their case before the electorate. Our republic was designed by the Framers of the Constitution to achieve systemic reform only when widespread support is achieved among the American people. The system rests on the recognition of dangers inherent in power concentrated in any one individual or group. We have been blessed with a system of governance specifically designed to distribute power and assure broad consensus to cool the passions of the day through shared and balanced power granted to the president, Congress, and the courts.
It was most decidedly not designed to produce change by the barrel of a gun.
To the extent Martin Luther King Jr. succeeded in changing the hearts and minds of average Americans, it was by exhorting his followers to renounce violence. MLK was virtuous in his mission, but also wise in the ways of the world. He recognized that even the most just cause will surely be subsumed by evil done in its name. In other words, if there is a righteous message accompanied by violent mobs, people will remember the latter and forget the former.
If those with a true and abiding interest in racial justice wish to succeed, they must take all necessary measures to separate themselves from the insurrectionists acting in their name who have fomented only fear, hate, and destruction. They must demonstrate the seriousness of their commitment by actively purging those who have hijacked their cause. Otherwise, their efforts will return void. This is a statement not of any particular set of values, but of human nature itself.
In the wake of the riots that decimated Kenosha, Wisconsin, one woman voter captured the sentiment: “I’m not going to remember them for anything they said,” she said of the protesters. “I’m going to remember them for what they did to their own city.”